Did you know? (Xbox VS PS3)?

Question

Its so funny how the truth gets revealed sooner or later.

I have been telling my friend that the same technology in the cell is also in the xbox 360.

IBM stated years ago that the cell technology is the same tech in the 360, but for some reason it was overlooked until now.

Did you guys know that the 360 can also produce 2 times more polygons than the ps3.

Sony claimed at the ps3 launch that the ps3 is 2 teraflops. (2 trillion flops)Floating Point Operations/sec

The truth is the ps3 is about 600 Gflops (600 billion flops).

Sony lied again.

Microsoft claimed xbox 360 is the first console capable of 1 teraflop (1 trillion flops).

Microsoft told the truth.

360 is the first and only true console that is a SUPERCOMPUTER on the market today.

Sony doesnt want you to know that.

the XBOX is more powerful than the ps2

the XBOX 360 is more powerful than the ps3

In the end what really matters is the games though
but its nice to know that you got the most powerful console on the market

NOTE: ps3 is more expensive not because its more powerful, but because it has a bluray drive, if the ps3 had a dvd drive it would probably be cheaper than the xbox 360.

- both the ps3 and 360 uses 512 MB of RAM,

but sony split the ram in the ps3, 256 MB RAM for graphics, and 256 for the CPU.

360 on the other hand has unified memory 512, so they can use more than 256 for graphics, 360 can use 320 or up to 384 for graphics, thats why ps3 games ported from 360 suffers, washed out colors, frame rate problems, texture resolution, etc.

Games developed for ps3 runs fine, but still lack color variety like the upcoming killzone 2.

Answer 1

Quote: 'OMFG the 360 is more powerful than the PS2? No way, no way'



The guy that sed that... is an IDIOT. Oh yeah... a 360 is less powerful that a ps2.. wot crap!!



I have PS2, Xbox, PS3 and 360. My fave is 360.. To be hounest... i am really dissapointed in the ps3. its way too expencive and no one with a brain gives a crap about blueray!!



I prefer my xbox than the ps2 because the xbox has a hard drive.





My order of Favorite consoles is: 360, Xbox and PS2 are even and my PS3 is last.. They have the worst variety of games...



Please give me best answer... i would really appriciate it :)

Answer 2

Hi Fanboy First sony doesn't lie and 360 has alot problems and xbox 36o isn't cheaper than ps3 because xbox wifi adapter is about 100$--150$ and you have to pay 50$ per year to play online while ps3 has both free in it so in the long run ps3 is cheaper also xbox 360 doesn't has web browser like ps3 and just take a look about that let down the Xbox 360, it's older and doesn't have a greater future.

Myself, I bought the PS3; and this because it is at about the same stage of Xbox but has a great future.

Look, I have to admit that the Xbox 360 is CURRENTLY better, only by a bit; and that's only due to it being older so having more games and so.



But look at this: The Xbox has HD-D Disc formats, which support up to 15 gigabyte of space. And the PS3 has Blu-Ray format discs, which support up to 50 gigabyte of space!

And now, the average new-generation console is at 12 gigabyte of space.

So that means Xbox can only hold up till end of this year, and then games will be to big to run on it.

Anyway, xbox 360 is at it's max-power now, and PS3 is about half-power now, even less.

Because it's using only 2gb-ram out of 4, and 2 broad-cell engines out of 5. Also the fact that its graphics mod concludes up to 15giga hrt's /sec, and GTA IV, which is the second-most requiring PS3 game now, uses 9 giga hrt's /sec.

Which the xbox360 only has max 10, and forcing it could make 11 giga hrts /sec.

So, xbox is now, PS3 is future, look at PS3 Home, for free and a ps3 or other console should last atleast 5 to 6 years, by then the xbox 720 is out, and the PS3 will remain very good for another 10 years, much more.



So that's it, PS3 is better than xbox360, and most people here are xbox fan-boys, just cause they had to buy the 360 they only say that its good. But look at the Red Ring of death, xbox has 33 percent failure rate and PS3 0.02 percent, seriously!

So your choice; but when it comes to graphics console, power, great futur, more features coming soon, then the PS3 is the best choice; defenitly when the price doesnt matter for you.. So what do you say fanboy loooooooool





PS: The Sims 3 is not coming for xbox

Answer 3

yeah the 360 looks way better than the ps3 thats why games like killzone 2, uncharted and mgs4 arent or will never be possible on the ps3, and GT5 doesnt look photo realistic ...what ever helps you sleep at night.





BTW what does "lack of color and variety" mean? the demo for KZ2 looks beautiful, and the gameplay is great. ANd have you seen uncharted theres so much "color and variety" in the game, Uncharted 2 will be on par graphics wise with KZ2. and GT5 has color and variety in it as well, heavenly sword also has lots of color in it so im not sure what you are talking about



btw if the 360 is s "supercomputer" then why do games look better on pc. Also th ps3 processor is much more powerful then the 360s, it was also designed to work with the ps3 graphics card, which takes alot of pressure off the ps3 gpu, and allows for better graphics

Answer 4

Im sorry but your wrong ps3s processor is way more powerful.



and to the idiot xbox fanboy ps3 is better



I would like to see your source because last time i checked



The Ps3s processor had 8 cores and didn't cause the red ring of death multiple times like the 360s knockoff 3 cores

Answer 5

i knew xbox 360 was more powerful then ps3. gears of war 2 is impossible to be made on ps3 because ps3 doesnt have much ram and the graphics card sucks. xbox 360 is alot more powerful then ps3

Answer 6

OMFG the 360 is more powerful than the PS2? No way, no way hosê.

Answer 7

dam right. the 360 wrecks the ps3 in almost every way. i still have both but if i had to choose one to chuck away itd be the ps3.