?
2011-04-25 09:06:25 UTC
i personally think modern warfare 2 is better because it was fun, and better connection, in black ops, the lag, (it still lags) , the rubbish modes, rubbish maps, rubbish dark graphics, unrealistic character clothing, the game is too balanced, its just no fun, rubbish connection when inviting and playing with friends, rubbish long and boring storymode, the long time it takes to load the game, the rubbish servers that are still rubbish, rubbish weak weapons
(black ops is hacked, but treyarch are banning and resetting hackers, otherwise it would be hacked worse than modern warfare 2, treyarch is just resetting and banning people from playing and hacking, otherwise the game hacked)
zombies is better than spec ops, but i mean zombies was already in W@W , its nothing new, same sh*t different pile
treyarch took modern warfare 2 and imrpoved what was there, imrpoved and added some new things, balanced it out, but some new ideas were rubbish , like the Valkhyree rocket replaces the predator missile, dogs came from W@W , care package is the same, sam turret is simlar to EMP , chopper gunner replaces pave low, napalm strike and mortar team are similar to harrier strikes and airstrikes, rc-xd is just annoying, that is not balance, too short killstreak.... they copied mw2 and improved
(nevermind the fact that psn is down)
so what do you think, is black ops better than modern warfare 2?