Battlefield 3 or black ops 2 ?

Question

Battlefield 3 or black ops 2 ?

Answer 1

Okay, so Battlefield 3's campaign is very bad, but the multiplayer is extremely fun and brings out the best in the game, but It's heavily team dependent.



on the other hand, Black Ops 2 has helluva campaign, I loved it so much, Call of Duty franchise has been famous for making hear-breaking campaigns, however, The multiplayer isn't much new, same stuff, but the Zombies make up for that, I do prefer Black Ops 1 zombies, but zombies are still zombies buddy, you can group up with your friends and just play hours and hours of zombies.



I would advice you to wait, Battlefield 4 and CoD: Ghosts are coming out, but up to you..

Also, I wouldn't mind if you buy both games, they're both good shooters and you'll enjoy them.

Answer 2

Campaign: black ops 2 was one hart braking game with Hart stopping moment's. The campaign is great and if you want to know more about the campaign like get a taste of it you can here: http://www.ign.com/wikis/call-of-duty-black-ops-2/Multiplayer

Battlefield 3 had more war moment's, so if you like a game with no-stop action, Battlefield is for you.





Multiplayer: Black ops 2 was more funner with all the game mode's and thing;s like that. But if you hate

people who trash talk, DO NOT GO ONLINE. This game has people trash talk all day every day, In witch i understand getting killed. but this game had a fun over all if you are looking to play with friend's.



Battlefield 3 has a more army type of way. In multipayer you can drive jeep's ride tank's, fly helicopters and also fly jets and much much more. This game is a realistic game. if you get shot your done. you will not be able to escape a shoot out 50% of the time.



CO-OP: battlefield 3 has a co-op system where you fight a-i kinda like campaign but a tad bit harder.



Black ops 2 has ZOMBIE"S. this is a must have in the call of duty serise or so i think. zombie's is a blast with a lot of gun's ammo and zombie's with up to 8 player and 4 player co-op. black ops 2 will win the fun in co-op but is battlefield ore realistic? Yes but black ops 2 won co-op

Answer 3

I like black ops better for 3 reasons, 1. zombies-really fun unique part of the game 2.the campaign is much better than any shooter games I know of 3.fun and addicting multiplayer, not the best but still lots of stuff to do and get. so overall it's a really addictive great fps that is easy to play and is super fun.

Answer 4

im going to expand a bit on what amar said

yes it is true that battlefields campiagn is iffy at best and yes it is true that BO2 has a FAR superior campiagn.

battlefield 3 is much more realistic in terms of shooting, bullet drop, scope preferances etc. and it is not as team based as he says, there is group effort which is different and has to be considered. team effort means you all work at the same time doing stuff/ talking etc. group effort is more upon what it's based off of. group effort is everyone trying to accomplish one thing while occasionly talking to each other/ giving signals. you can just as easily lone wolf it (as i do often) or get on join a clan and go balls deep in it. of course bf3 allow vehicles in multiplayer/ single player vs bo2 which only rarely allows this and even then it's either because of a kill streak or because your in a single player mission murdering countless hordes of enemies.

NOW THEN for BO2

BO2 (sadly) at this point is just taking black ops 1 and setting it 20-30 yrs in the future when mason has a son and you play as him for the most part. the campiagn is amazing, you start with lots of pointless killing a quick betrayl that screws u harder than u can imagine and then it turns into you saving the world (or not) from a terrorist that is trying to destroy most of the worlds superpowers. you get cool gadgets (stealth, grenades that shoot from you wrist, etc) and some very interesting things to hack. the problem i have is with it's multiiplayer. 8/10 times you get a bunch of little kids runing around cursing at you because you sniped them/ killed them with hip fire and they scream HACKS through the mic. though i must say the multiplayer weapons have improved in terms of less op guns (IE in black ops 2 any 3 round burst was a guarnteed insta kill. or in MW3 where the striker could kill from 30ft away in 1-3 shots) 3 round burst is still strong but it was nerfed enough to make it a fair fight. however my biggest issue is just how repetitive the game is. you go around. shoot people. and stand at an objective while the other team tries to do the same.



now in personal opinon BF3 multi> BO2 multi BO2 campiagn> BF3 campiagn BF3 overall> BO2 overall

battlefield is for people who want to put more than 5-10 minutes into a game and get either trolls or ****tards for team mates. but it takes some time to get accustomed to how the game works. bo2 is simple. u walk in and shoot everything in sight. so with that in mind choose wisely.

Answer 5

black ops has zombies