Question:
which is better ps3 or xbox 360?
JuniorskT
2009-02-07 17:15:03 UTC
cant make up my mind please help
21 answers:
Street
2009-02-07 17:19:16 UTC
Well, the PS3 systems have a failure rate of about 1% while the Xbox 360s run at about 30%. This means that there is a higher chance that your Xbox will encounter a problem sometime during the time you have it and you will have to ship it back, which will take time and in some cases, money. Generally, the online community for the 360 is bigger and the game library is much larger compared to that of the PS3. Really, it just depends on the titles you are interested in. I'd personally suggest the 360.
itzJV
2009-02-08 01:31:44 UTC
The Xbox 360 wins by a long shot. It has the name, the games, the online experience, and support from the gaming companies. Whenever there are games released for both the 360 and the PS3, the 360 always gets favored due to the easy coding that game designers can work with. Not many of the designers understand the work of the PS3, which is why people complain about the PS3 game version doesn't have a certain feature that the 360 version has.



Don't listen to these Sony Fanboys. I'm speaking from experience and honesty. I'm a big-time video gamer, I own nearly EVERY system ever created. I promise you, the 360 is the way to go. Also, Sony's going bankrupt. They've stopped manufacturing PSPs and PS3s with PS2 Compatibility. You may need to watch out for that, if for some strange reason you go the PS3 way.
jffenway
2009-02-08 01:30:57 UTC
Xbox 360 is great. There are much more games and it has better graphics. Whenever there is a game that is " only for ps3", it usually is a remake ps2 or ps1 game that wasn't to popular. Most special games for 360 are brand new and have a great plot, great scheme, Cool online modes and special modes. If a special game is made for ps3, it usually has the same plot as the old ones, same scheme as the old ones, it has great facial details but crappy body and setting details. In a national pole Xbox won over Ps3
2009-02-08 01:17:47 UTC
Performance: On paper, the PS3 is more powerful. In reality, it’s quite inferior to the 360. Without getting into too many details, the three general-purpose CPU’s the xbox360 has are currently FAR easier to take advantage of than the SPU’s on the PS3. I suspect a few years down the road some high budget, first party PS3 exclusive titles will come out that really take advantage of the SPU’s and do things the XBOX 360 can’t, but I don’t think the console is worth buying based on this speculation (for some it will be though, we'll have to wait and see how these games turn out).





Graphics: The XBOX 360 is a clear winner. The GPU is more powerful. It has more powerful fillrate, and far more pixel and vertex processing horsepower. Part of the reason is their choice of memory, and architecture of pixel and vertex procesing. I can’t get into details but the same vertex shader will run much slower on the PS3 than the XBOX 360. The 360 also has a clever new way rendering high definition anti aliased back buffers. To accomplish the same effect on PS3 is prohibitively expensive. For this reason I think many games will have no choice but to run in non-HD resolutions on the PS3 version, use a lower quality anti aliasing technique, or do back buffer upscaling. The end result in all cases is going to be noticeably worse image quality.



Game Selection: The XBOX 360 has a huge head start here. 1 year is an eternity in gaming. Almost all multi-platform developers have made the XBOX 360 their primary platform due to timing of release-to-market, this means the games will look and perform better on the 360. The PS3 versions will be ports of the 360 versions. (The opposite was true for XBOX 1 vs. PS2). The XBOX 360 is also far faster to develop for due to better development tools (massively popular Visual Studio .NET vs. proprietary, buggy PS3 compiler and debugger), better documentation, and easier architecture (3 general purpose CPU’s vs. 8 specialized processors that require DMA). Timing has also caused all next-gen middleware developers to make XBOX 360 their primary platform, and they will ‘add ps3 support’ as needed. This support will probably be inferior to the XBOX 360’s due to manpower and more importantly, demand. It’s this catch-22 now that will continue to drive the 360 forward and hold PS3 back.



The other obvious point here is that right now the Xbox360 already has a very impressive line-up of titles on store shelves; the ps3 just launched, and has virtually nothing of interest. Also, many 360 games are already discounted. PS3 games are all full price since it just launched.



Live: Microsoft’s online support with XBOX1 was phenomenal. They built in-house experience, user base, facilities, $$ commitment from executive level (since it proved successful), and most importantly, feedback from 100,000s of XBOX Live subscribers. Playstation 2’s online support sucked. They are now playing catch-up, trying to emulate Xbox’s model. But they had their hands tied just trying to make the PS3 work, it was incredibly ambitious (blu-ray etc.). I haven’t seen it yet, but I seriously doubt the quality will be anywhere to the level of XBOX 360.



HD Content: The PS3 comes with one built in (blu-ray). The XBOX 360 offers HD-DVD as an add-on for $200. You probably don’t care about HD-DVD right now. But you will soon (The quality between DVD and HD is comparable to VHS vs DVD, if you have the right TV) so I suggest paying attention to the war that’s begun. There are two formats: HD-DVD and BLU-RAY. Basically if you rent a BLU-RAY DVD from Bockbuster, it won’t play in your XBOX 360 HD-DVD, and vice versa with the PS3. The implications of this format war would require another article on its own. But as far as the consoles are concerned, the XBOX 360 wins because the DVD player is a separate unit. Playing movies is very taxing on the DVD reader, and let’s face it. In 3 years when your PS3 DVD drive goes out due to playing lots of movies (PS2 was notoriously bad about this) you will have to go buy another PS3. With the 360, you’ll just chuck your HD-DVD player, and go buy another one at the store. In 3 years standalone units wlil probably only cost about $99-150. Another point for the XBOX 360, is that I don’t know who will win the format-war, so I would rather wait with purchase of a HD player. The PS3 doesn’t give you this option.
trigg
2009-02-08 01:19:54 UTC
I've had both (ps3 first). After selling my ps3 and buying a 360 elite i have to so elite is a lot better especially if you play online. btw that guy xbox is HD
2009-02-08 01:18:53 UTC
Xbox 360, online play is amazing! Yes, you do have to pay for XBox live, but thats only because they care that you have a good connection to other playes, unlike Ps3, where they dont care, and the game is extra laggy.
2009-02-08 01:17:39 UTC
Xbox 360 is way better
2009-02-08 01:21:18 UTC
it matters what you want, ps3 offers what xbox 360 xbox except more features such as, blue ray player, tilt controller for certain things in games, wireless online with it and free online, xbox 360 i like better because of the online live part, it has more of really popular games i think.



hope this helps
2009-02-08 01:20:16 UTC
Look at the console exclusives, (ie. the PS3 has Ratchet & Clank, Killzone 2, Haze etc. etc. and the 360 has Halo, Gears of War etc. etc.) and decide which one has games you'd want to buy.
2009-02-08 01:21:04 UTC
ps3 for sure

blue ray means more space and better graphics quality

lots of space

all the best selling games are on ps3

ps3 more games than 360

ps3 more bargin for your buck

ps3 internet= free, 360 internet= stingy you gotta pay

ps3 makes video chats with the eyetoy camera
Stealthsurfer21
2009-02-08 01:19:05 UTC
Xbox 360!!!! TONS of games
2009-02-08 01:20:18 UTC
I own both and they both have their benefits. I get fed up of hearing this question.



360 has more games, online is good but you have to pay for it.

PS3 has blu-ray player, not as many games, online is free, you can install linux and dump blu-ray iso's to an external drive. etc etc.



Like i said, they both have their benefits. Buy both and find out for yourself.
2009-02-08 01:17:45 UTC
xBox 360.
west tex
2009-02-08 01:19:35 UTC
Having both systems myself, I have to go with the ps3.
mz..sourberry
2009-02-08 01:26:28 UTC
xbox360



and if you do decide to get it make sure you get xbox live and HALO 3 BEST GAME EVA !!!!!!!!1(and Im a Girl so u should listen 2 me because that's a like a dude game)
Vitto✦
2009-02-08 01:19:13 UTC
But of of course the PS3. Many new releases are coming!!
CuT13Br!
2009-02-08 01:19:45 UTC
ps3
2009-02-08 01:20:05 UTC
PS3!
Unknown
2009-02-08 01:18:12 UTC
well ps3 is much better because it is HD
2009-02-08 01:18:15 UTC
PS3.
iaskyoutell89
2009-02-08 01:17:54 UTC
Girls.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...