Question:
Halo 4 vs Black Ops II?
Chilo Llamas
2012-06-24 21:32:13 UTC
I just wanna know what people think.

I personally think Halo 4 on terms of quality. It may even sell more than BO2 on 360 due to Halo 4 being a TRUE Halo sequel to 3.

So tell me what YOU think. :)
Eight answers:
?
2012-06-24 21:51:54 UTC
If Halo 4 multiplayer is like an arena shooter then Halo hands down



the only big difference I really see is graphics, and Black Ops II requires iron sights.



Halo = better graphics, but 20-->30fps

CoD = worse graphics, but 50-->60fps
John
2012-06-24 21:45:13 UTC
They are both way overrated. Halo sucks now cause it takes forever to kill people online, the guns aren't changing and the campaign is all stories I've heard or read about already. Black Ops II is another gimmick from treyarch or whoever is running the show now, to rob you of your money. Have you noticed that combat hasn't changed in COD since the first Modern Warfare, and everything is basically the same. Interface is very similar in all of them, online still sucks cause you get all those losers who sit in their room for 10 hours at a time playing paired up with people who just got the game yesterday. The campaigns are all the same, and they say Black Ops 2 is going to have a dynamic story line based on the players choices but lets be honest... In 1 year they wont be able to do anything. It took Blizzard Entertainment more then half a decade to make diablo 3 and it still wasn't that good... And that's blizzard, they made world of Warcraft, Starcraft, and Diablo II all record breaking games in terms of online compatibility, play and interaction as well as graphics and gameplay. Treyarch is not that good and they are pumping out games every year as oppose to blizzards 4-7 years per game. Don't waste your money man, The main Halo story line ended with three, they are just continuing it to make money not to finish a story or anything, and the call of duty franchise died at MWII the fact that they are putting out a game every November really shows they are trying to make games fast, and are basically just making minor changes to the same game, editing the story and setting and selling it for 60 bucks, then a year later you go pay another 60 and another year later you spend another 60. You are wasting your money don't get either both franchises are log past expiration date
Austin M
2012-06-24 21:35:17 UTC
Why would you compare Halo 4 to Black Ops II? Personally, I think Halo 4 will have better gameplay and that Call of Duty sucks and hasn't been good since World at War, but that's just my opinion.
2012-06-24 21:39:51 UTC
I think Black Ops II will be exactly what you expect it to be, so if you liked the previous CoDs then you will probably like this one too.



Halo 4 is a more complicated matter, being in the hands of a new team, even if it is comprised of old Bungie members, throws it up in the air. In addition to a large amount of gameplay changes, additions, and somewhat worrying detractions, we'll just have to wait and see if it lives up to our standards.



tl;dr - Wait until Halo 4 comes out before judgement is passed, and even then, it's still up to personal tastes.
Jigaar
2012-06-24 23:36:03 UTC
Halo 4.

Black ops 2 = same old COD4 graphics and engine
2012-06-24 21:32:48 UTC
Black ops 2
Alex
2012-06-24 21:36:57 UTC
BO2 cuz bungie isnt making halo 4 anymore and its gonna be way different from 3 and black ops 2 is gonna be sweet watch the trailers
2012-06-24 22:07:37 UTC
Both will inevitably suck, but Halo will be slightly better.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...